Nephrotic Syndrome: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches.

Nephrotic edema stands out as one of the most common complications of nephrotic syndrome. The effective management of hypervolemia is paramount in addressing this condition. Initially, "the underfill hypothesis" suggested that proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia led to fluid extravasation into the interstitial space, causing the intravascular hypovolemia and activation of neurohormonal compensatory mechanisms, which increased the retention of salt and water. Consequently, the recommended management involved diuretics and human-albumin infusion. However, recent findings from human and animal studies have unveiled a kidney-limited sodium-reabsorption mechanism, attributed to the presence of various serine proteases in the tubular lumen-activating ENaC channels, thereby causing sodium reabsorption. There is currently no standardized guideline for diuretic therapy. In clinical practice, loop diuretics continue to be the preferred initial choice. It is noteworthy that patients often exhibit diuretic resistance due to various factors such as high-sodium diets, poor drug compliance, changes in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics, kidney dysfunction, decreased renal flow, nephron remodeling and proteasuria. Considering these challenges, combining diuretics may be a rational approach to overcoming diuretic resistance. Despite the limited data available on diuretic treatment in nephrotic syndrome complicated by hypervolemia, ENaC blockers emerge as a potential add-on treatment for nephrotic edema.

Sodium citrate versus sodium bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic acidosis (MA) is frequently associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Our aim was to compare the effect of oral sodium citrate (SC) with that of oral sodium bicarbonate (SB) on renal function and serum bicarbonate correction, as well as to evaluate their safety profile in patients with MA of CKD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-center, randomized 1:1, parallel, controlled, unblinded clinical trial of 124 patients with MA and CKD stages 3b and 4. The primary outcome was the mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The secondary outcomes were mean change in serum bicarbonate level, eGFR decrease by 30%, eGFR decrease by 50%, dialysis, death or prolonged hospitalization, and a combined endpoint. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of mean eGFR change [adjusted mean difference = -0.99 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: -2.51 to 0.93, P = .20)]. We observed a mean serum bicarbonate change of 6.15 mmol/L [(95% CI: 5.55-6.74), P < .001] in the SC group and of 6.19 mmol/L [(95% CI: 5.54-6.83), P < .001] in the SB group, but no significant difference between the 2 groups [adjusted mean difference = 0.31 mmol/L (-0.22 to 0.85), P = .25]. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed similar risks regarding eGFR decrease by 30% (P = .77), eGFR decrease by 50% (P = .50), dialysis (P = .85), death or prolonged hospitalization (P = .29), and combined endpoint (P = .57). Study drug discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly more common in the SB group (17.7% vs 4.8%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: SC and SB have a similar effect on kidney function decline, both improve serum bicarbonate level, but SB is associated with higher rates of medication discontinuation due to adverse events.

Oral Furosemide and Hydrochlorothiazide/Amiloride versus Intravenous Furosemide for the Treatment of Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Data on diuretic treatment in nephrotic syndrome (NS) are scarce. Our goal was to assess the non-inferiority of the combined oral diuretics (furosemide/hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride) compared to intravenous (i.v.) furosemide in patients with NS and resistant edema. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized trial on 22 patients with resistant nephrotic edema (RNE), defined as hypervolemia and a FENa < 0.2%. Based on a computer-generated 1:1 randomization, we assigned patients to receive either intravenous furosemide (40 mg bolus and then continuous administration of 5 mg/h) or oral furosemide (40 mg/day) and hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride (50/5 mg/day) for a period of 5 days. Clinical and laboratory measurements were performed daily. Hydration status was assessed by bioimpedance on day 1 and at the end of day 5 after treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was weight change from baseline to day 5. Secondary endpoints were hydration status change measured by bioimpedance and safety outcomes (low blood pressure, severe electrolyte disturbances, acute kidney injury and worsening hypervolemia). RESULTS: Primary endpoint analysis showed that after 5 days of treatment, there was a significant difference in weight change from baseline between groups [adjusted mean difference: -3.33 kg (95% CI: -6.34 to -0.31), p = 0.03], with a higher mean weight change in the oral diuretic treatment group [-7.10 kg (95% CI: -18.30 to -4.30) vs. -4.55 kg (95%CI: -6.73 to -2.36)]. Secondary endpoint analysis showed that there was no significant difference between groups regarding hydration status change [adjusted mean difference: -0.05 L (95% CI: -2.6 to 2.6), p = 0.96], with a mean hydration status change in the oral diuretic treatment group of -4.71 L (95% CI: -6.87 to -2.54) and -3.91 L (95% CI: -5.69 to -2.13) in the i.v. diuretic treatment group. We observed a significant decrease in adjusted mean serum sodium of -2.15 mmol/L [(95% CI: -4.25 to -0.05), p = 0.04]), favored by the combined oral diuretic treatment [-2.70 mmol/L (95% CI: -4.89 to -0.50) vs. -0.10 mmol/L (95%CI: -1.30 to 1.10)]. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of oral diuretics based on furosemide, amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide is non-inferior to i.v. furosemide in weight control of patients with RNE and a similar safety profile.

Immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients.

PURPOSE OF STUDY: The purpose of this review is to provide the current state of immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with HIV and to discuss practical dilemmas to better understand and manage these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Certain studies find higher rates of rejection, which raises the need to critically assess the approach to immunosuppression management in HIV-positive KTR. Induction immunosuppression is guided by transplant center-level preference rather than by the individual patient characteristics. Earlier recommendations expressed concerns about the use of induction immunosuppression, especially utilizing lymphocyte-depleting agents; however, updated guidelines based on newer data recommend that induction can be used in HIV-positive KTR, and the choice of agent be made according to immunological risk. Likewise, most studies point out success with using first-line maintenance immunosuppression including tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. In selected patients, belatacept appears to be a promising alternative to calcineurin inhibitors with some well established advantages. Early discontinuation of steroids in this population carries a high risk of rejection and should be avoided. SUMMARY: Immunosuppression management in HIV-positive KTR is complex and challenging, mainly because of the difficulty of maintaining a proper balance between rejection and infection. Interpretation and understanding of the current data towards a personalized approach of immunosuppression could improve management in HIV-positive KTR.

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection after Kidney Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review.

Tuberculosis (TB) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients is an important opportunistic infection with higher incidence and prevalence than in the general population and is associated with important morbidity and mortality. We performed an extensive literature review of articles published between 1 January 2000 and 15 June 2022 to provide an evidence-based review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of TB in KT recipients. We included all studies which reported epidemiological and/or outcome data regarding active TB in KT, and we approached the diagnostic and treatment challenges according to the current guidelines. Prevalence of active TB in KT recipients ranges between 0.3-15.2%. KT recipients with active TB could have a rejection rate up to 55.6%, a rate of graft loss that varies from 2.2% to 66.6% and a mortality rate up to 60%. Understanding the epidemiological risk, risk factors, transmission modalities, diagnosis and treatment challenges is critical for clinicians in providing an appropriate management for KT with TB. Among diagnostic challenges, which are at the same time associated with delay in management, the following should be considered: atypical clinical presentation, association with co-infections, decreased predictive values of screening tests, diverse radiological aspects and particular diagnostic methods. Regarding treatment challenges in KT recipients with TB, drug interactions, drug toxicities and therapeutical adherence must be considered.

Non-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation: Immunity and Genetic Insights.

The polymorphic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system has been considered the main target for alloimmunity, but the non-HLA antibodies and autoimmunity have gained importance in kidney transplantation (KT). Apart from the endothelial injury, secondary self-antigen exposure and the presence of polymorphic alloantigens, respectively, auto- and allo- non-HLA antibodies shared common steps in their development, such as: antigen recognition via indirect pathway by recipient antigen presenting cells, autoreactive T cell activation, autoreactive B cell activation, T helper 17 cell differentiation, loss of self-tolerance and epitope spreading phenomena. Both alloimmunity and autoimmunity play a synergic role in the formation of non-HLA antibodies, and the emergence of transcriptomics and genome-wide evaluation techniques has led to important progress in understanding the mechanistic features. Among them, non-HLA mismatches between donors and recipients provide valuable information regarding the role of genetics in non-HLA antibody immunity and development.

The Impact of Kidney Biopsy for Fabry Nephropathy Evaluation on Patients' Management and Long-Term Outcomes: Experience of a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare lysosomal storage disease causing progressive loss of target organ function. All renal cell types are involved from the early stages, even before clinical signs can be detected. FD-specific therapies can stop/mitigate disease progression. Thus, it is important to validate early markers of renal lesions so that they can be adopted as criteria for timely treatment initiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed and extensively evaluated 21 FD case patients; this evaluation included a kidney biopsy. We looked for the influence of pathological findings on the management of FD patients. In addition, we investigated the association between general and FD-specific features and long-term patients' outcomes. We defined a combined endpoint as being at least one of the following: 50% decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, kidney failure (KF), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or death and mortality. RESULTS: Our cohort of 21 FD patients (11 males and 10 females) was stratified according to the presence of the combined endpoint: group 1 (n = 15) included patients without the combined endpoint, while group 2 (n = 6) patients reached the combined endpoint outcome. Patients from group 2 presented lower mean baseline eGFR (72.2 ± 38.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 82.5 ± 26.4 mL/min/1.73 m2) without statistical significance (p = 0.44), but significantly (p = 0.22) higher median baseline proteinuria (2.7 g/24 h vs. 0.4 g/24 h). Specific lysosomal deposits were identified in all patients. Segmental sclerosis was present in all patients with the combined endpoint and in only 33% of patients without the combined endpoint (p = 0.009). Global sclerosis and interstitial fibrosis were present in both groups, with no significant differences. A total of 15 out of the 16 treatment-naïve patients (7 males and 9 females) started FD-specific therapy after kidney biopsy. Treatment was initiated in all male FD patients and in 8 female patients. In 2 females, pathological findings in kidney biopsy offered important reasons to start FD treatment, although specific criteria of the Romanian protocol for prescription of FD-specific therapy were still not fulfilled. Cox univariate analysis showed that every increase in 24 h proteinuria with 1 g is associated with a 65% risk of developing the combined endpoint (HR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.05-2.58; p = 0.02), and that the presence of segmental sclerosis increased the risk of developing the combined endpoint by 51.3 times (HR = 51.3; 95% CI: 95% CI: 1.67-103.5; p = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative risk of developing the combined endpoint was higher in patients in whom segmental sclerosis (100% vs. 0%, log-rank test, p = 0.03) was present. CONCLUSIONS: Histological evaluation is an important tool for the detection of early kidney involvement and provides additional support to the early initiation of FD-specific therapy. Presence of segmental sclerosis can predict the long-term outcomes of kidney disease deterioration and mortality and may be used as an early indicator of disease progression. Additionally, in the absence of other criteria according to current guidelines, specific FD renal lesions as revealed by kidney biopsy might become a distinct criterion to initiate FD therapy.

COVID-19: a trigger for severe thrombotic microangiopathy in a patient with complement gene variant.

The evidence regarding thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) related to Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with complement gene mutations as a cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) are limited. We presented the case of a 23-year-old male patient admitted with an asymptomatic form of COVID-19, but with uncontrolled hypertension and AKI. Kidney biopsy showed severe lesions of TMA. In evolution patient had persistent microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, decreased level of haptoglobin and increased LDH level. Decreased complement C3 level and the presence of schistocytes were found for the first time after biopsy. Kidney function progressively decreased and the patient remained hemodialysis dependent. Complement work-up showed a heterozygous variant with unknown significance in complement factor I (CFI) c.-13G>A, affecting the 5' UTR region of the gene. In addition, the patient was found to be heterozygous for the complement factor H (CFH) H3 haplotype (involving the rare alleles of c.-331C>T, Q672Q and E936D polymorphisms) reported as a risk factor of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. This case of AKI associated with severe TMA and secondary hemolytic uremic syndrome highlights the importance of genetic risk modifiers in the alternative pathway dysregulation of the complement in the setting of COVID-19, even in asymptomatic forms.

Serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor as a potential biomarker of renal impairment severity in diabetic nephropathy.

AIMS: To investigate serum soluble form of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy (DN), its correlation with histological parameters and its capacity as a biomarker for renal impairment severity. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 75 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and DKD, among whom 28 had biopsy-proven DN. RESULTS: Among the 75 patients, 9 (12%) had type 1 and 66 (88%) type 2 DM. The median value of the serum suPAR level was 2857.2 pg/mL (1916.4-3700) in the entire cohort and 2472.1 pg/mL (1782.6-3745.8) in the biopsy-proven DN subgroup, respectively. suPAR was significantly correlated with diabetes duration, diabetic retinopathy, anti-proteinuric treatment, albuminuria, kidney function, DN class, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) score and with interstitial inflammation score. suPAR had a good accuracy for the association with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages G3b-5, macroalbuminuria, DN class IV, IFTA score 3 and interstitial inflammation score 2. CONCLUSIONS: Serum suPAR was increased in DN patients and was associated with DM duration, diabetic retinopathy, renoprotective treatment, kidney function, proteinuria, DN class, IFTA and interstitial inflammation scores. Also, suPAR had a good capacity as a biomarker for advanced renal impairment and severe histological lesions of DN.

Immunosuppression as a Risk Factor for De Novo Angiotensin II Type Receptor Antibodies Development after Kidney Transplantation.

(1) Background: Angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) represent a topic of interest in kidney transplantation (KT). Data regarding the risk factors associated with de novo AT1R-Ab development are lacking. Our goal was to identify the incidence of de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT and to evaluate the risk factors associated with their formation. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 56 adult patients, transplanted between 2018 and 2019. Recipient, donor, transplant, treatment, and complications data were assessed. A threshold of >10 U/mL was used for AT1R-Ab detection. (3) Results: De novo AT1R-Ab were observed in 12 out of 56 KT recipients (21.4%). The median value AT1R-Ab in the study cohort was 8.5 U/mL (inter quartile range: 6.8-10.4) and 15.6 U/mL (10.8-19.8) in the positive group. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, induction immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (OR = 7.20, 95% CI: 1.30-39.65, p = 0.02), maintenance immunosuppression with immediate-release tacrolimus (OR = 6.20, 95% CI: 1.16-41.51, p = 0.03), and mean tacrolimus trough level (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14-4.85, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT. (4) Conclusions: De novo AT1R-Ab development at 1 year after KT is significantly influenced by the type of induction and maintenance immunosuppression.

Successful Treatment of Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Using Rituximab: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Kidney involvement is a frequent complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and kidney biopsy is essential in differentiating lupus nephritis (LN) from thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) secondary to antiphospholipid autoantibodies (aPL). Association between antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and acquired hemophilia due to inhibitors was very rarely described in SLE patients. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 61-year-old male diagnosed with SLE who acquired deficiency of clotting factor VIII due to circulating inhibitors, admitted for acute kidney injury (AKI), microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and diplopia. Kidney biopsy showed TMA due to APS, but no signs of LN. Head computed tomography identified low dense areas in the white matter, suggesting small blood vessels' involvement. A diagnosis of probable catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) was established and treatment with low molecular weight heparin, intravenous methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis, and rituximab was initiated, followed by resolution of AKI, diplopia, and TMA with complete depletion of CD19+B-lymphocytes (CD19+B-Ly) after one month. We further review the current knowledge regarding pathogenesis and management of CAPS in SLE patients. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted therapy was possible after kidney biopsy, improving renal and general prognosis. CD19+B-Ly repopulation preceded biological relapse, so monitoring of CD19+B-Ly may serve as a tool to predict relapses and guide rituximab therapy.

Trabecular bone score and bone mineral density in acromegalic osteopathy assessment: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: The evaluation of acromegalic osteopathy is a subject of current interest as there is a lack of evidence concerning proper evaluation techniques and clear diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone mineral density (BMD) in acromegaly patients compared to healthy controls. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 43 acromegaly patients recruited between 2018 and 2020 and a healthy control group matched 1:1 for age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). All subjects underwent DXA, lumbar spine TBS, and bone turnover markers measurement. RESULTS: Acromegaly patients showed significantly decreased lumbar spine TBS (1.244 ± 0.117 vs. 1.343 ± 0.124, p < 0.001) and no difference regarding BMD compared to control patients. In the subgroup analysis, TBS was significantly lower in both males and females (1.282 ± 0.075 vs. 1.366 ± 0.113, p = 0.01 and 1.222 ± 0.132 vs. 1.329 ± 0.130, p = 0.005) and, also, in hypogonadal and eugonadal acromegaly subjects compared to their healthy controls (1.231 ± 0.130 vs. 1.306 ± 0.125, p = 0.04 and 1.280 ± 0.065 vs. 1.381 ± 0.113, p = 0.008). Femoral neck BMD was higher in acromegalic hypogonadal patients [1.027 (IQR: 0.939-1.135) vs. 0.876 (IQR: 0.737-1.014), p = 0.004]. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that TBS, but not BMD, is significantly decreased in acromegaly patients, regardless of gender and gonadal status. This data suggests that TBS could be a valuable tool in the assessment of acromegalic osteopathy.

The early impact of preformed angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies on graft function in a low immunological risk cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

Intruduction and aim: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) are associated with graft rejection and poor graft outcomes in kidney transplantation (KT). We aimed to assess the frequency of preformed AT1R-Ab and their impact on graft function and survival at 1 year after KT in a low immunological risk cohort. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational cohort study in 67 adult KT recipients, transplanted between 2018 and 2019. A cut-off value >10 U/ml was used for AT1R-Ab detection. RESULTS: The frequency of preformed AT1R-Ab was 10.4% and the median value of their level was 8.4 U/ml (IQR: 6.8-10.4). Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA-DSA) were absent, no case of biopsy-proven rejection was reported and the incidence of graft failure was 7.5%. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly reduced in the AT1R-Ab group [35 (29.8-55.2) vs 56.1 (41.3-66.5) ml/min, p = 0.02] at 1 year after KT. After multivariate linear regression analysis, preformed AT1R-Ab were found as an independent determinant of eGFR at 1 year after KT (ß: -15.395; 95% CI: -30.49 - -0.30; p = 0.04). By Cox multivariate regression analysis, preformed AT1R-Ab were not associated with graft failure (HR: 1.36; 95% CI:0.10-14.09; p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Preformed AT1R-Ab are an independent determinant of graft function but do not impact graft survival at 12 months after transplantation in a prospective low immunological risk cohort of KT recipients.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in kidney transplantation: An evidence-based comprehensive review.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) are among the most investigated types of non-HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation. Our aim is to provide an update regarding the clinical relevance of AT1R-Ab by outlining their prevalence, testing methodology, mechanism of graft injury and the association with graft rejection phenotypes, the relationship with HLA-donor specific antibodies (DSA) and some therapeutic aspects. To accomplish these, we performed a literature review between 2005 and 2019, identifying 27 relevant studies for inclusion. The reported prevalence of these antibodies is widely variable in part related to testing variability and lack of a standardized threshold for positivity. Data available suggest that both pre-formed and de novo antibodies are associated with negative graft outcomes. The pathogenesis of AT1R-Ab mediated graft injury seems to be complement-independent. Different phenotypes of antibody-mediated, T-cell-mediated and vascular rejection have been described in patients with AT1R-Ab. The relationship between HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab is mutual in terms of their development, including a complex process between alloimmunity, autoimmunity, inflammation, endothelial damage and antigen expression. Antibody double positivity had a synergistic negative effect associated with detrimental effects on graft outcomes. Understanding the complexity of AT1R-Ab mediated graft injury and the relationship with HLA-DSA in kidney transplantation could provide a complementary, integrated assessment of immunological risk, help stratify the risk of graft rejection and dysfunction and may guide the treatment approach.

Clinical Predictors of Preeclampsia in Pregnant Women with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background and Objectives: Pregnant women with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Preeclampsia (PE) superimposed on CKD is estimated to occur in 21%-79% of pregnancies. Both conditions share common features such as proteinuria and hypertension, making differential diagnosis difficult. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and the clinical-biological predictors of preeclampsia in pregnant women with CKD. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 34 pregnant women with pre-existing CKD admitted to our department between 2008 and 2017. Results: Among the 34 patients, 19 (55.8%) developed PE and the mean time of occurrence was 31.26 ± 2.68 weeks of gestation. The median value of 24-h proteinuria at referral was 0.87 g/day (interquartile range 0.42-1.50) and 47.1% of patients had proteinuria of ≥1 g/day. Patients with PE tended to be more hypertensive, with a more decreased renal function at referral and had significantly higher proteinuria (1.30 vs 0.63 g/day, p = 0.02). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that proteinuria ≥1 g/day at referral and pre-existing hypertension were independently associated with PE (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-11.02, p = 0.005, adjusted hazard ratio = 2.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-6.77, p = 0.04, respectively). The cumulative risk of PE was significantly higher in pregnant women with proteinuria ≥1 g/day at referral (log-rank, p = 0.003). Proteinuria ≥ 1 g/day at referral and pre-exiting hypertension predicted PE development with accuracies of 73.5% and 64.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Pregnant patients with pre-existing CKD are at high risk of developing preeclampsia, while proteinuria ≥ 1 g/day at referral and pre-existing hypertension were independent predictors of superimposed preeclampsia.

A single-arm pilot study of metformin in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Metformin has shown promising results regarding cystogenesis inhibition in preclinical studies with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) models. We designed a prospective, preliminary, single-arm study to evaluate the tolerability, safety and the effect of Metformin on kidney function and body mass index (BMI) in Romanian patients with ADPKD. METHODS: We enrolled 34 adult patients with ADPKD, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-5 not on dialysis and without diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was to assess the tolerability and safety of Metformin. The secondary endpoints evaluated changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body mass index (BMI) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) necessity. Patients received an initial dose of Metformin of 500 mg/day within the first month that was increased to 1000 mg/day thereafter according to tolerability. Change in eGFR and BMI was expressed as mean difference with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals and as a percentage. For the primary endpoint, we included all 34 enrolled patients. To assess the secondary endpoint, intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients out of 34 completed the follow-up period at 24 months. Eighteen patients developed adverse events and 63.6% of these events were gastrointestinal related. Nausea was the most common adverse event (17.6%). Two patients (5.8%) permanently discontinued medication due to adverse events. We recorded no case of hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis or death. Mean eGFR changed by - 1.57 ml/min/1.73m2 (95%CI:-22.28 to 19.14, P = 0.87) in ITT and by - 4.57 ml/min/1.73m2 (95%CI:-28.03 to 18.89, P = 0.69) in PP population. Mean BMI change was - 1.10 kg/m2 (95%CI:-3.22 to 1.02, P = 0.30) in ITT population and - 0.80 kg/m2 (95%CI:-3.27 to 1.67, P = 0.51) in PP analysis. Three patients (8.8%) needed RRT. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin was well tolerated, had a good safety profile even in ADPKD patients with advanced CKD and it was not associated with change in eGFR or BMI across the follow-up period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on https://www.isrctn.com (number ISRCTN 93749377); date registered: 02/25/2019.